Chicago has decided not to apply for federal grants that now focus on law enforcement and immigration, a shift made by the Trump administration. The city's mayor, Brandon Johnson, stated that Chicago won't comply with what they see as political aims disguised as public safety measures.

The U. S. Department of Justice (DOJ) changed the grant program, originally designed to prevent community violence, to support law enforcement instead. This change has sparked conflict between Chicago and the federal government. Mayor Johnson believes the administration's decision to cut over $800 million in violence prevention grants in April was politically driven.

Chicago's refusal to apply for these grants is the latest clash with the administration over immigration policies. Previously, the city sued the Trump administration over what they called illegal restrictions on other community policing grants.

So far, Chicago is the only city to publicly reject the new grants. Other cities, like Newark, New Jersey, and Columbia, South Carolina, are still applying. The DOJ's changes to the program exclude community organizations from direct funding and prohibit services for undocumented residents, reducing the total funding to $34. 6 million.

The DOJ stated that the revised grants will support law enforcement by hiring more officers and purchasing equipment. However, former DOJ officials and experts argue that this shift deviates from the program's original purpose, which was to support marginalized communities affected by crime.

President Trump's immigration crackdown has been a significant part of his political agenda. Critics, like Reneé Hall from The National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives, see the new grant conditions as an overreach to further the administration's agenda.

The White House maintains that their approach to crime mitigation has been successful. Meanwhile, cities applying for the grants, like Columbia, South Carolina, are seeking clarification on the new requirements.

DOJ GRANTS

Chicago Stands Firm Against Federal Grant Changes

Continue reading...