Senator Angus King faced backlash for his vote to conclude the 41-day government shutdown. Across Maine, protests erupted, and his offices received angry calls and threats. Critics accused him of betrayal, with comments like "Time to retire" and "Traitor" flooding online spaces. Despite the uproar, the editorial board saw his decision as practical, not treasonous.

King's choice to end the shutdown wasn't a sudden shift but a step he had been moving toward. His independent status and seniority allowed him to prioritize common sense over political battles. The anger directed at him didn't make his decision wrong; it reflected the broader political tensions.

The shutdown's end was a relief, but the underlying issues remained. The government could now resume normal operations, including crucial tasks like pursuing Affordable Care Act subsidies. However, the political climate was far from settled.

Ron Schmidt, a political science professor, predicted that President Trump would soon give Democrats more substantial reasons to be angry. This hinted at the ongoing political struggles beyond the shutdown.

The shutdown's resolution was a necessary step, but it didn't solve the deeper problems. The focus should shift to addressing the incompetence and stubbornness that led to such a prolonged crisis.

SENATORS DECISION

Maine's Mixed Reactions to King's Shutdown Decision

Continue reading...