A Fresh Look at a Failed Crypto Law

United States, USAThu Jun 04 2026
The bill called the Lummis‑Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act was a plan to bring digital money into the U. S. government’s oversight system. It arrived in Senate committee files on July 12, 2023 and never passed before the Congress ended. Because it stalled, it is treated as a dead proposal today. The main idea was to set up rules for crypto that involve many federal agencies. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, banks, consumer protection groups, Treasury, and FinCEN would each have a role. The goal was not to approve all crypto activity but to put it under federal eyes and tackle safety, fairness, stablecoins, taxes, cyber threats, and illegal money use. If it had passed, the law would have let the CFTC take control of certain crypto trades across state lines. Exchanges dealing in crypto or stablecoins would have had to register with the CFTC, unless a specific exception applied. The bill proposed standards for listings, limits on insider trading, and rules to keep investors’ money separate from the firm’s own funds. On the securities side, the act tried to define an “ancillary asset. ” That would be a token linked to business work but not giving holders debt or equity rights. Companies that met disclosure rules could treat those tokens like commodities, while other token sales would still fall under securities law.
The proposal also aimed to protect customers. Crypto firms would need proof that they owned or controlled customer assets and would be audited each year by an independent accountant. Agreements with users would have to use plain language, explain how funds are kept safe, and describe dispute‑resolution steps. The bill also pushed for guidance on cybersecurity from the CFTC and SEC, working with Treasury and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. A special part of the bill dealt with stablecoins, which are digital currencies that aim to keep a fixed value. It suggested banks could issue and redeem these coins, but only if they held enough liquid assets to cover all coins in circulation. The plan also included small tax changes, like a $200 “de‑minimis” allowance for crypto gains, and stronger rules against money laundering. Because the bill never became law, these tax ideas are not current rules. The last official action on the proposal was a committee hearing in October 2023. Later digital‑asset bills and hearings are separate matters; they do not mean the original act was enacted.
https://localnews.ai/article/a-fresh-look-at-a-failed-crypto-law-a0da8fce

actions