A Judge Schools the Government on Sex Ed Basics
A federal judge has taken a stand against the Trump administration's attempt to cut funds for sex education programs, questioning the government's reasoning behind the move.
The Administration's Claim
The administration claims it wants to "protect" kids from "radical gender ideology." However, critics argue that the real issue is the administration's refusal to acknowledge the existence of transgender people.
Judge Ann Aiken's Stance
During a hearing in Oregon, Judge Ann Aiken called the administration's move unfair and illogical. She highlighted that schools have already started their programs and hired staff. The judge also questioned the government's lawyer on the basics of sex education, asking:
- Can transgender youth get pregnant?
- Can nonbinary people get STIs?
The answer to all these questions is yes.
Advocates' Reaction
Sex education advocates praised the judge's tough stance, emphasizing the need for all young people to receive accurate information about sex and health.
The Administration's Motives
The administration's plan to cut funds appears to be driven by fear and ignorance. Comprehensive sex education, including information about transgender and nonbinary youth, is crucial for schools.
The Judge's Potential Impact
The judge's decision could play a significant role in ensuring that comprehensive sex education continues to be taught in schools.