POLITICS

A Judge's Clever Move to Protect Babies' Rights

USASat Jul 12 2025

A judge in New Hampshire has found a unique way to stop a controversial executive order. The order, issued by Donald Trump, aims to change birthright citizenship. The judge didn't use the usual method to block the order. Instead, he used a class-action lawsuit. This lawsuit covers babies born in all 50 states. It includes babies born to mothers without legal status. It also includes babies born to mothers who are only temporarily in the U. S.

New Questions Raised

The judge's move raises new questions. One question is about the Supreme Court's recent decision. The decision limited the use of nationwide injunctions. These injunctions allow judges to block policies they find unlawful. The judge's move also raises questions about the power of class-action lawsuits. Can they serve as a check on the executive branch's power?

Administration's Response

The Trump administration is not happy with the judge's decision. They argue that future children can't be part of the class action. They say that protecting their rights before they are born violates due process. But the judge disagrees. He argues that these "future persons" will be harmed by the executive order. He believes they should be included in the class action.

Supreme Court's Involvement

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has given the federal government 30 days to start enforcing the birthright citizenship executive order. The judge's injunction is on hold for seven days. This gives the Department of Justice time to appeal the decision.

Other News

Kilmar Abrego Garcia

The Trump administration is sending mixed messages about the fate of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He is a Salvadoran immigrant who was deported to El Salvador. He was then flown back to the U. S. He is now in pretrial detention. His lawyers want him to stay in jail. They say this is to prevent the government from deporting him again.

Venezuelan Immigrants

The government is also sending mixed messages about Venezuelan immigrants. They were sent to El Salvador without due process. The administration says it has no power to bring them back. But a new court document contradicts this. It shows that El Salvador has no jurisdiction over these immigrants. The U. S. controls their fate.

questions

    How does the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. CASA influence the judicial strategies used to challenge executive orders, and what are the implications for future cases?
    What are the potential consequences of the Trump administration's claim that it has no jurisdiction over the Venezuelan migrants removed to El Salvador?
    How does the Trump administration's claim of no jurisdiction over the Venezuelan migrants impact the principles of due process and international law?

actions