POLITICS

A Statue Stunt: Louisiana Governor's Questionable Tribute

USATue Nov 04 2025

Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry has sparked controversy with his proposal to erect a statue of Charlie Kirk at Louisiana State University (LSU). Kirk, a conservative commentator, was tragically assassinated while speaking at Utah Valley University. Landry claims this statue would celebrate free speech, but many see it as a political maneuver.

Questions About the Statue's Purpose

Kirk never studied at LSU, nor did he have any significant connection to Louisiana. This raises questions about the true purpose of the statue. Historically, monuments have often been used to assert dominance rather than honor history. For instance, Confederate statues were erected in places where those figures never lived or fought, serving as symbols of power.

Landry's Approval Ratings and Hypocrisy

Landry's approval ratings have been plummeting, and this move seems like an attempt to grab attention. It's also hypocritical, considering his past actions. As attorney general, he sued a reporter for requesting public records and demanded punishment for an LSU professor who criticized his assistant.

Opposition from LSU Community

Many LSU students and faculty are likely to oppose this statue. Kirk's views on race and civil rights are controversial, to say the least. LSU women's basketball star Flau'jae Johnson publicly criticized Kirk's rhetoric, asking supporters to unfollow her if they aligned with his views.

Free Speech Concerns

The governor's claim that this statue is about free speech rings hollow. Kirk's organization, Turning Point USA, has been known to harass professors with differing views. Moreover, Landry's own actions show a lack of commitment to free speech. His lawsuit against a reporter and demand for punishment against a professor speak volumes.

Historical Parallels

This situation mirrors the debate over Confederate monuments. Often, those defending these monuments create fictional narratives to justify their existence. But the truth is, monuments reveal more about the people who erect them than the figures they depict. Landry's proposal seems to be more about asserting control than promoting free speech.

questions

    If Governor Landry is so concerned about free speech, why not just tweet about it instead of a statue?
    How does Governor Landry's proposal align with the historical context of controversial monuments in the United States?
    Could Governor Landry's proposal be a distraction from other political issues he is facing?

actions