CRIME

A Young Man Faces Justice for a Shocking Synagogue Fire

Australia, MelbourneThu Jul 31 2025

In Melbourne, a 21-year-old man named Giovanni Laulu is in legal trouble. He is accused of setting fire to a synagogue last December. This incident left the community shaken and sparked a huge investigation.

The Incident

Laulu appeared in court after being arrested at a home in Melbourne. Police believe he is one of three people who broke into the Adass Israel Synagogue. They poured a flammable liquid inside and started the fire. A worshipper who was there early in the morning suffered minor burns.

The Suspect and Charges

Laulu is the first person caught, but police think more people were involved. They even suspect some accomplices planned the attack from another country. Laulu is charged with:

  • Arson
  • Reckless conduct
  • Car theft

During the court hearing, Laulu said nothing except confirming his name. His lawyer mentioned that this isn't his first time in prison. The judge decided to keep him in custody until the next hearing in August.

The Investigation

The investigation is massive, involving:

  • Federal and state police
  • Australia's main spy agency

Over 220 officers have spent more than 50,000 hours on this case. Police say the fire was likely politically motivated.

Police and Government Response

The head of Victoria Police, Mike Bush, said they will not stop until everyone involved is caught. He emphasized that people should feel safe in their places of worship. The synagogue fire is the only incident classified as terrorism in Australia, which means more resources are available for the investigation.

Since the war in Gaza started, there has been a rise in antisemitic attacks in Australia. The government has promised 30 million Australian dollars to rebuild the damaged synagogue.

questions

    Did the arsonist use a match or a lighter, or did he just rub two sticks together like a caveman?
    What evidence supports the claim that the synagogue fire was politically motivated?
    What are the potential biases in the investigation that could affect the outcome?

actions