AI in Churches: A Double-Edged Sword

In the world of faith, AI is making waves, but not everyone is on board. Some church leaders are using AI to handle tasks like emails and scheduling, freeing up time for more important work. The Rev. Justin Lester, for example, uses AI to manage his busy schedule, allowing him to focus on preaching and community work. He admits AI has made him a better pastor, but he's not sold on using it for spiritual guidance. The big question is: where do we draw the line? AI can help with admin tasks, but can it really replace human connection? Some leaders are worried about the impact of AI on the spiritual side of things. They argue that AI can't provide the same depth of understanding as a human can. The Pope, for instance, has refused to create an AI version of himself, calling it an "empty, cold shell. " Despite these concerns, AI is becoming more common in churches. A recent survey found that nearly 90% of faith leaders now support using AI in some form. But with this rise in usage comes a rise in concerns. Leaders are worried about the safety of personal data and the potential for AI to misalign with their teachings. Some churches are taking steps to address these concerns. The Southern Baptist Convention, for example, has adopted a resolution on AI, urging "utmost care and discernment" in its use. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has also issued guidelines for the use of AI. But the debate is far from over. Some experts argue that AI is an "assault on human dignity" and the essence of agency. They worry that AI could strip away the friction of real relationships, which often shape character. Others argue that AI can be a powerful tool for helping earnest seekers of truth. In the end, the question is not whether AI will be used in churches, but how it will be used. Leaders must guide its use responsibly and ethically, ensuring that it enriches faith rather than hollowing it out.