Apple Stands Firm on DEI Policies Despite Pressure

Cupertino, USATue Jan 14 2025
Tech giant Apple is asking its investors to keep the company's diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies intact. This comes as other businesses and organizations face pressure to roll back similar initiatives following the 2023 U. S. Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action. A conservative think tank, the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR), has called on Apple to scrap its DEI policies, arguing they expose companies to litigation and financial risks. However, Apple's board, led by CEO Tim Cook, has rejected this proposal. They believe the plan to reverse DEI policies is an inappropriate attempt to micromanage the company. Apple will vote on this issue at its virtual annual meeting on February 25. Other large companies, such as Meta, Amazon, and McDonald's, have also faced similar pressures and have either reversed or changed their DEI policies. Some states like Alabama and Florida have even banned public funding for DEI programs in schools and universities. Apple argues that its approach to DEI is carefully considered and compliant with laws and regulations in multiple jurisdictions. The company maintains that its management and board actively oversee legal and regulatory risks. Lowe's, a home improvement chain, recently announced plans to end participation in Human Rights Campaign surveys and consolidate its diversity resource groups under one umbrella. This decision came after Lowe's was praised for its pro-LGBTQ+ stance and its CEO was named the "Ethical Leader of the Year. "
https://localnews.ai/article/apple-stands-firm-on-dei-policies-despite-pressure-22f163fd

questions

    Since Apple's DEI policies are justified as necessary for legal compliance, does that mean Steve Jobs was secretly a compliance lawyer?
    How do Apple's leadership and board ensure that their DEI policies comply with the complex legal landscape across multiple jurisdictions?
    How does Apple's board justify that its DEI policies do not expose the company to 'litigation, reputational and financial risks'?

actions