POLITICS

Birthright Citizenship: What’s the Story?

Washington, D.C., USAThu Jan 23 2025
President Trump’s recent order aims to change the rules on who can automatically become a US citizen. He wants to stop children born to undocumented immigrants from getting citizenship. This goes against the 14th Amendment, which says anyone born in the US is a citizen. Lawyers and judges are now debating this big change. The 14th Amendment was created to fix a bad decision from the past. In 1857, the Supreme Court said Black people couldn’t be citizens. The 14th Amendment was made to change that. Now, some people worry that Trump's order could make a new problem. The Supreme Court might have to decide if Trump’s order is legal. Some judges think the 14th Amendment is clear and doesn’t need changing. Others think the words in the Amendment could mean different things. Trump’s order could affect many kids. If they can’t get citizenship, they might not be able to get important benefits or vote when they grow up. This could create a new group of people in the US without full rights. People are also talking about a case from 1898. A man named Wong Kim Ark was born in the US to Chinese parents. The Supreme Court said he was a citizen. Some people think this case proves that Trump’s order is wrong. The Supreme Court has changed its mind on big issues before. But this time, they might not want to change the rules on birthright citizenship. We’ll have to wait and see what happens.

questions

    How does the current Supreme Court's originalist approach impact their potential interpretation of the 14th Amendment and birthright citizenship?
    Should we expect a surge in applications for citizenship from babies born after Trump's order?
    What historical context can be drawn between the Dred Scott case and Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship?

actions