ENVIRONMENT

Cacao Farmers and the Knowledge Gap in Agroforestry

ColombiaWed Apr 30 2025
Cacao farming in Colombia is at a crossroads. The way farmers and experts think about land use is evolving. Agroforestry is a big part of this change. It's a way to use land that mixes trees, crops, and sometimes animals. The goal is to make farming more sustainable. But there's a problem. The knowledge systems that guide these practices are not as integrated as they could be. Farmers often rely on outside experts for advice. This is because the official knowledge systems are mostly top-down. They come from scientists and are not always practical for the farmers' needs. This approach can oversimplify complex farming issues. It can also make farmers feel dependent on external advice. To understand this better, researchers talked to 42 people involved in creating and sharing knowledge. They also worked with 18 farmers to map out their management practices. The results were interesting. When farmers share their experiences, they show a deeper understanding of agroforestry. This suggests that social learning can boost their independence and ability to adapt. But farm management is not just about knowledge. It's also about the context. Things like climate changes and market access play a big role. This means that integrating farmers' practical knowledge is crucial. It can lead to more sustainable and context-sensitive decisions. This is important for the future of cacao farming in Colombia. Farmers have a wealth of experience. But this knowledge is often overlooked. By valuing and incorporating it, agroforestry practices can become more effective. This can lead to better outcomes for both the farmers and the environment. It's a win-win situation. But it requires a shift in how knowledge is valued and shared.

questions

    In what ways can social learning be fostered among cacao farmers to enhance their adaptive capacity and independence?
    Is the simplification of cause-and-effect thinking in agroforestry a deliberate strategy to control farmers' practices?
    Could there be hidden agendas behind the promotion of top-down scientific knowledge in agroforestry that benefit certain corporations?

actions