TECHNOLOGY
Can Crypto Gambling Fuel Science?
Copenhagen, DenmarkTue Nov 11 2025
Ideosphere, a startup with ambitious goals, aims to harness the power of crypto prediction markets to fund early-stage scientific research. The idea is to redirect funds from crypto gambling towards high-risk, high-reward research that traditional investors often overlook.
The Problem
- Talent and innovation exist, but funding is scarce.
- Traditional investors often shy away from risky projects, leaving many ideas unfunded.
- Ideosphere wants to create a marketplace of ideas where researchers can present hypotheses, and traders can speculate on them.
- The spread from these trades would then go to the researchers.
Challenges and Solutions
Potential Issues
- Decentralized science projects come with risks, such as corruption and errors.
- Researchers might manipulate results to close markets unexpectedly.
Proposed Solutions
- Dispute System: Ideosphere plans to implement a dispute system, possibly using the UMA Protocol.
- Rewards users who initiate correct disputes.
- Penalizes those who don't, creating a crowdfunded peer review.
- Vetting Process: Researchers will need to:
- Secure a deposit.
- Undergo a vetting process that includes user voting.
- Provide estimates on commercial viability and time-to-market.
Additional Initiatives
- Discovery Markets: Identify high-impact, feasible projects that could be funded with minimal resources.
- Researchers can access crowdfunding and prediction market trading spreads.
- Caveat: They'll need a lot of volume to generate substantial funding.
Current Status
- Early Stages: Only front-end mockups available so far.
- Funding: Received 10,000 USDt from the Blockchain for Good Alliance.
Conclusion: It's a bold idea, but only time will tell if it can truly redirect speculative energy towards scientific progress.
continue reading...
questions
How will Ideosphere's dispute system effectively handle disputes and ensure fair outcomes for all parties involved?
If Ideosphere's prediction markets become too popular, will researchers have to deal with crypto traders who think they know more about science than actual scientists?
What criteria will be used to vet researchers and their projects, and how will this process ensure the quality and feasibility of the research?
actions
flag content