HEALTH
Can Virtual Care Keep the Human Touch?
Sat May 10 2025
Virtual healthcare has become a big deal, making medical help more accessible. Yet, this shift brings fresh ethical questions, especially about how doctors and patients connect. This is where the ideas of a French thinker, Emmanuel Levinas, come in handy. He talked about the importance of face-to-face encounters and the responsibility we have towards others. So, how does this play out in virtual healthcare?
In the digital world, patients and doctors don't meet face-to-face. This can make their bond less personal. Levinas believed that seeing someone's face makes us feel a strong sense of duty towards them. In virtual care, this might get lost. The screen can hide the person behind the patient, making it harder to show genuine care and understanding.
But, virtual healthcare isn't all bad. It makes healthcare more reachable, especially for those who can't easily visit a clinic. The challenge is to keep the human touch alive in these digital meetings. One way is to follow Levinas' ideas. This means focusing on empathy, really listening, and seeing the patient as a unique person, not just a set of symptoms.
Doctors can start by taking a moment to connect with the patient before diving into the medical talk. They can also use video calls more often than just voice calls. Seeing the patient's face can help build a stronger bond. Plus, doctors can train to be more aware of the patient's feelings and needs, even through a screen.
Another big question is how to keep this human touch as technology advances. As virtual reality and AI become more common, the risk of losing that personal connection grows. It's crucial to find ways to keep the focus on the patient's humanity. This could mean setting rules for how tech is used in healthcare or teaching doctors to use tech in a way that keeps the human touch.
In the end, virtual healthcare can be a great tool. It just needs to be used right. By keeping Levinas' ideas in mind, doctors and patients can still have meaningful connections, even when they're not in the same room. It's all about remembering that there's a person on the other side of the screen, with feelings, fears, and needs.
continue reading...
questions
Are virtual healthcare platforms deliberately designed to reduce the ethical responsibility towards patients?
If a patient's internet connection drops, does that mean they are no longer the 'Other' in the ethical encounter?
What are the potential long-term effects on patient care if the relational depth is diminished in virtual healthcare?
inspired by
actions
flag content