Colorado's Gas Heating Dilemma: Who Pays the Price?

Colorado's push to cut greenhouse gas emissions is putting a squeeze on homeowners who rely on natural gas for heating. The Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has set a new target: gas utilities must slash emissions by 41% by 2035. This is a big jump from the previous goal of a 22% reduction by 2030. This move is not sitting well with many Coloradans, especially those who have already taken steps to make their homes more energy-efficient. For example, one homeowner replaced old windows, added insulation, and upgraded their heating system. Despite these efforts, they now face higher heating bills to help gas companies meet the new emissions targets. The cost of compliance is staggering. Two major power companies estimate they need $1. 4 billion to meet the 2030 mandate. With the PUC doubling its demands by 2035, billions more will be needed. These costs will inevitably be passed on to consumers, making heating bills skyrocket. The impact will be felt most by low- and moderate-income households. Switching from gas to electric heating is not a viable option for many families, as installing a heat pump can cost over $20, 000. Wealthier households may qualify for rebates to make the switch, but the remaining gas users will subsidize these rebates through their heating bills. As more people switch to electric, the fixed costs of maintaining the gas infrastructure will be spread among fewer users, leading to higher bills for those who stay on gas.There's an irony here. Natural gas is a major source of energy for electricity production in Colorado, generating nearly 40% of the state's electricity. As coal is phased out, natural gas use in electricity production is expected to grow. Solar and wind power are important but intermittent, so reliable sources like natural gas or nuclear power are necessary to meet demand. Natural gas is also a significant part of Colorado's economy. It's used in electricity production, industrial and commercial sectors, and home heating. It's also a major export, with Colorado being the eighth largest natural gas producing state in the U. S. The question is, why is natural gas acceptable for electricity generation and industrial use but not for home heating? The PUC's decision seems arbitrary and unfair, especially to those who have already taken steps to reduce their energy consumption. The PUC needs to rethink its decision, or the legislature needs to take action to address this inequity. The current plan puts an unfair burden on many Coloradans, particularly those who can least afford it.