POLITICS
Court Halts Controversial Research Grant Cuts
USA, BostonTue Jun 17 2025
A federal judge in Boston made a significant ruling. He declared that the Trump administration's decision to cancel research grants was unfair and unlawful. These grants were from the National Institutes of Health. They were for studies on diversity, equity, and inclusion. The judge said the government was discriminating against racial minorities and the LGBTQ community.
The judge, William Young, said the NIH broke the law. They stopped over $1 billion in research grants. This was because of the grants' connection to diversity initiatives. Young decided to restore the grants. These grants had been given to organizations and states that sued over the cancellations. He hinted at a broader decision in the future. He said the government's actions were clearly discriminatory. He vowed to stop it.
The Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the NIH, plans to appeal. They stand by their decision. They say the grants prioritized ideology over science. They want to ensure taxpayer dollars support evidence-based practices. They are exploring legal options, including an appeal.
The American Civil Liberties Union represents the grant recipients who sued. They said Young's ruling affects hundreds of grants. The plaintiffs include the American Public Health Association and 16 states led by Massachusetts.
The NIH has ended 2, 100 research grants. These grants total about $9. 5 billion. They also ended $2. 6 billion in contracts since Trump returned to office. The cuts are part of Trump's efforts to reshape the government. They also aim to slash federal spending and end support for DEI programs and transgender healthcare.
The judge will consider more claims later. He will decide whether to reinstate more grants. The grant terminations have affected universities. Many depend on NIH grants for research budgets. Some have implemented hiring freezes, travel restrictions, and layoffs. Researchers are leaving for positions abroad. Long-running studies are also at risk.
The Trump administration has tried to cut other research funding. In February, a judge blocked a rule. This rule would have limited how much the government paid for research costs. The administration estimated it would cut $4 billion in funding to research centers.
continue reading...
questions
In what ways might the reinstatement of these grants by Judge Young impact the future of public health research in the United States?
If the NIH grants were reinstated, would we finally get to see a study on why pizza tastes better when you eat it cold out of the box?
Will the reinstated grants include funding for a study on the best way to make a perfect cup of coffee?
actions
flag content