Data Centers: The New Battleground for Local Politics

In many states, voters are starting to see data centers as a serious issue that can sway elections. A recent poll showed only 28 % of people would stop a new data center if it was built within three miles of their home, while the same number were unsure and 37 % supported it. The numbers differ slightly between political groups: just over a quarter of Trump voters would oppose a nearby center, and a third of Harris voters would not want one. Because data centers use huge amounts of electricity, experts warn that rising power bills could become a campaign talking point. In places like Michigan and Georgia, candidates who are not the front‑line names in national races are using the topic to stand out. One Michigan hopeful, for example, promised that any new center would pay its own power costs and meet job‑creation pledges. He also said he had never taken money from the local utility company, hoping that would make him seem honest. In Georgia’s crowded gubernatorial race, a low‑profile candidate released a platform that would stop taxpayers from subsidizing data centers and require them to use energy‑efficient technology. He also said he would not give these projects a free pass, hoping to appeal to voters worried about the cost of living.The debate is still early, but some lawmakers see a chance to shape policy. A former Pennsylvania environmental official said that if data centers drive up electricity costs, voters could blame the projects. He added that candidates who can balance job creation with environmental safeguards will win. Across the country, a handful of candidates are looking at data centers as a way to bring jobs while protecting water and power resources. Some, like a former electric‑utility engineer in Pennsylvania, say they are not against data centers at all but want stronger local control. Others, like a New York state senator, argue that new centers should only get grid priority if they also build clean power. In Utah, a former tech employee says voters hate projects that are hidden and subsidized. The issue is new enough that it could split voters more by where they live than by party. Those living near a proposed center might oppose it regardless of whether their representative is Republican or Democrat. If this trend grows, the topic could become a key factor in deciding local elections.