POLITICS

Democrats' Abortion Stance: A Divided Party?

Texas, USAThu Feb 06 2025
The Democratic Party has shifted dramatically over the years, especially regarding abortion. Once, both Democrats and Republicans advocated for protections for unborn children and mothers. Now, the situation is very different. In 1976, the Hyde Amendment, which restricted federal funding for abortions to cases of rape, incest, or when the mother's life was at risk, passed with overwhelming support. Fast forward to today, and even basic protections for infants born alive during abortions struggle to gain traction. Many young voters are taking notice of this shift. A poll from January 2025 revealed that fewer than 10% of Millennial and Gen Z voters support the Democratic Party's stance on abortion, which includes allowing infanticide if a baby is born alive during a botched procedure. This is a stark contrast to the nearly 90% of young voters who believe that infants born alive should receive medical care, and nearly 70% who want emergency services to be called. The Democratic Party's stance on abortion has become a contentious issue, with many members of the party standing firmly behind the abortion lobby. This loyalty is not without cost. Millions of dollars from the abortion industry flow into the Democratic Party, buying political support but not necessarily voter loyalty. Many families, including those who once strongly supported the party, are now reconsidering their allegiance. The cognitive dissonance surrounding abortion is evident in various policies. For instance, the Democratic Party has manipulated the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to push chemical abortion pills onto the market, even relaxing safety standards. This move, made in the name of preserving abortion access during COVID-19, has exposed women to risks of injury, infertility, and even death. It has also given sex abusers easier access to these drugs and created environmental hazards. The environmental impact of abortion is another critical issue. Students for Life Action has called on the Trump administration to address the pollution caused by chemically tainted blood, placental tissue, and human remains from abortions being flushed away. This is a significant concern that needs attention from the FDA, Environmental Protection Agency, and Department of Health and Human Services. The Democratic Party faces a tough choice. They can continue to prioritize abortion as their main offering, or they can shift to an agenda that protects the vulnerable and promotes life. The tough votes are coming, and the party must decide which path to take.

questions

    Do the Democrats have ulterior motives for forcing the FDA to deregulate chemical abortion pills by the same day the FDA pulled a covid vaccine that caused blood clots and death?
    How can the Democratic Party claim to champion women's health when lowering standards for chemical abortion pills has increased risks of injury, infertility, and death?
    What are the potential long-term effects on the Democratic Party's voter base if they continue to support the abortion lobby's agenda, which includes infanticide?

actions