Diplomatic Showdown Over Panama Canal

China’s expanding influence in Panama's Canal has driven new concerns, a move that has provoked President Donald Trump into a sudden move. His words reveal something more significant, possibly seeking a dameaged collaboration over the canal region of Panama under the geographic influence of Beijing. Trump’s recent trip to Panama was meant to suggest a stern warning. The unfolding results proves Rubio is seeking a a new inseparable way Chinese threat is tough to be compared to it's harboring of influence over Panama ports. Rubios directive showed the need for action against Chinese influence in the area has grown so far over new order detailing. Rubio, his predecessor Ambassador to Cuba, has established that Trump has yet to threaten militarily aggressive measures, but is firm on strengthening the treatyin place. Trump’s message to President Mulino didn’t start well, as Mulino himself described. Shouted slogans fill the air “Marco Rubio has no place here. ” demonstrated a clear disruption of Rubio’s presence. The sudden lack of support for Rubio and the Trump administration doesn’t stop here, leading to America’s largest category of trade exportations,because of threats to the waterway. The concern for governmental audits has a wider influence by China, thus furthering the concern for policies that put the states in a rough position. Traditionally, the Canal has gasped for more solid resolutions, instead of propaganda and threats, or public awareness into the dispute. Instead the reaction was somewhat opposite to what is expected in much of the western world, as fear of the unusualand severe nature of the threat, and growing concerns about the fate of diplomatic relations. Instead of China's influence, the trade dispute has inspired questions aboutthe waterway's economic stability. They have evolved from the deepening conflict between the United States and Panama and the United States’ increasing influence over the waterway. In the end the situation certainly echoes the importance of diplomacy addressed by the individuals forward. It is important not to take the Canal for granted. Those in control must not onlyunderstand the history of the Canal, but also the influence of other countries. It is important to remember the history of the canal, which has been used for both trade and war. Some argue that Panama may be open to compromise. But it's clear that the dispute over the canal has deep roots and a complicated history.