Does Birthright Citizenship Order Leave Babies 'Stateless'?

USAFri Jan 24 2025
President Trump's recent executive order on birthright citizenship has sparked concern among immigrant groups. The order aims to limit citizenship to children born in the U. S. to parents who are citizens or permanent residents. But what does this mean for asylum-seekers? Imagine a Venezuelan couple seeking asylum in the U. S. They have a baby here, but can't register the child as a Venezuelan citizen. Why? Because Venezuela no longer has an embassy in the U. S. This leaves the baby in a tough spot – neither country recognizes them as a citizen. Ouch! This situation could affect not just Venezuelans, but any asylum-seeker from a country without a U. S. embassy. According to Juan De la Vega, an immigration lawyer in Miami, these kids might have to apply for asylum themselves or be added to their parents' claim. Not ideal! Even for countries with embassies, things aren't easy. Requesting a passport for a U. S. -born child could threaten the parents' asylum claims. That's a tricky situation! Some lawyers suggest there might be a loophole. If you're applying for asylum, you're here lawfully and intend to stay permanently. So, maybe these kids can still get citizenship? We'll have to wait and see how this plays out in court.
https://localnews.ai/article/does-birthright-citizenship-order-leave-babies-stateless-b1ae53f3

questions

    Will the executive order come with special instructions for storks delivering babies to asylum-seekers?
    How do the historical precedents for birthright citizenship in the U.S. compare with the proposed changes in the executive order?
    What are the long-term implications on the political landscape for children becoming stateless due to this executive order?

actions