EDUCATION
Education Funding Fight: Supreme Court Sides with Trump
Washington, USASat Apr 05 2025
The Supreme Court recently made a big decision. It allowed the Trump administration to cut hundreds of millions of dollars from teacher-training programs. This move is part of a broader effort to reduce diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. The court's decision was close, with a 5-4 split. Chief Justice John Roberts joined the three liberal justices in opposing the move.
The court's ruling is just one of many legal battles Trump is facing. There are about 150 lawsuits challenging his executive orders. Many of these lawsuits focus on funding cuts, some of which are worth billions. The specific case involves cuts to over 100 programs. A federal judge in Boston had temporarily blocked these cuts. The judge found that the cuts were already hurting programs meant to address a national teacher shortage.
The programs in question are the Teacher Quality Partnership and Supporting Effective Educator Development. They provide over 600 million dollars in grants for teacher preparation. These grants often go to subjects like math, science, and special education. The states involved argue that these programs have improved teacher retention rates. They also ensure that educators stay in the profession for more than five years.
The Supreme Court's conservative majority said the states can keep the programs running with their own money for now. They also noted that the federal government might not be able to recover the funds if they win the lawsuit. Justice Elena Kagan and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote separate dissents. They argued that there was no reason for the court's emergency intervention. Chief Justice Roberts did not join either dissent. He simply noted that he would have denied the appeal.
The administration stopped the programs without warning in February. A judge found that this action likely violated a federal law requiring a clear explanation. The appeals court that rejected the administration's request for a stay was also made up of judges appointed by Democrats. California is leading the lawsuit, with several other states joining in. Schools and colleges across the country have already felt the impact of these cuts. For instance, Boston Public Schools had to let go of several full-time employees. The College of New Jersey canceled its teacher-residency program. California State University ended support for dozens of students in a similar program.
continue reading...
questions
Are the cuts to teacher training programs a strategy to reduce the number of teachers who might challenge the administration's policies?
How might the cuts to teacher training programs affect the diversity and inclusivity in education?
How will the Supreme Court's decision impact the nationwide teacher shortage in the long term?