ENVIRONMENT
EPA Takes Aim at Climate Change Regulations
USAThu Mar 13 2025
The EPA has decided to rethink a big decision from over a decade ago. Back in 2009, they declared that greenhouse gases pose a serious threat to public health. This move is part of a larger plan to change or get rid of many environmental rules. The EPA is looking at rules about pollution from coal plants, electric vehicles, and even how we define protected waterways.
The EPA's plan includes reviewing rules about wastewater from oil and gas facilities, reporting from the oil and gas industry, coal ash management, air quality standards, industrial air pollutants, haze-causing pollution, and vehicle emissions. This is a big deal because these rules have been the backbone of U. S. efforts to combat climate change.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has big plans. He wants to roll back these regulations to boost the economy and energy security. He believes that these changes will benefit American industries and consumers. However, many climate experts are not happy about this. They argue that the science behind climate change is overwhelming and that these changes could face legal challenges.
The EPA is also planning to eliminate positions focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion, as well as environmental justice. This move is in response to recent executive orders aimed at ending certain government programs and preferences.
Climate experts are not impressed with the EPA's actions. They point out that the science on climate change is clear and that these regulatory changes could face legal challenges. Some experts even call this move a form of climate denial, where the threat of climate change is downplayed despite overwhelming evidence.
The EPA's decision to rethink the 2009 finding is a significant step. It could lead to years of legal battles and debates about the best way to protect public health and the environment.
continue reading...
questions
Could the elimination of diversity, equity, and inclusion positions at the EPA be a strategic move to suppress certain voices and perspectives?
What alternative strategies or policies could the EPA consider to balance environmental protection with economic growth?
How will the EPA's reconsideration of the 2009 endangerment finding impact current environmental regulations and public health?
actions
flag content