SCIENCE
Exploring Methyl Thiolate Movement on Copper Surfaces with Vacancy Voyages
Tue Dec 03 2024
Have you ever wondered how tiny molecules like methyl thiolate (CH₃S) move around on copper surfaces covered with chlorine or bromine? Scientists have studied this using a video scanning tunneling microscope (STM) in an electrochemical setup. But now, let's dive into how computer calculations help us predict their pathways.
Imagine you have a copper surface (Cu(100)) with a pattern like a tiny checkerboard (c(2 × 2)), covered with either chlorine (Cl) or bromine (Br) atoms. When methyl thiolate is adsorbed on this surface, it can move around. But how does it do that?
The first thing to note is that these halogen (Cl or Br) atoms can have different arrangements. Sometimes, there are gaps in their pattern, which we call vacancies. These gaps let methyl thiolate move more easily, with lower energy barriers according to density functional theory (DFT) calculations.
Now, you might think these vacancies are rare. But our calculations show that at least for chlorine-covered surfaces, even when you consider the energy needed to create a gap, the preference for this vacancy-assisted diffusion stays. It's like finding a shortcut in a crowded room—it makes the journey easier.
However, there's a catch. We haven't figured out yet how an electric field affects these energy barriers. An electric field might change the preferred movement pathway, so there's more to explore here. Stay tuned!
continue reading...
questions
Are the DFT calculations sufficient to accurately predict the diffusion paths and energy barriers for CH3Sad on Cu(100) surfaces covered with Cl or Br?
What are the potential challenges and limitations in applying DFT calculations to complex electrochemical systems?
Are the DFT calculations being manipulated to promote the preference for vacancy-assisted diffusion?
inspired by
actions
flag content