POLITICS

Federal Judge Calls Out Immigration Agents' Forceful Tactics

Chicago, USAFri Nov 07 2025

Judge Sara Ellis Orders Compliance with Rules

A federal judge has put a stop to some aggressive actions by immigration agents in Chicago. Judge Sara Ellis said the agents' behavior was shocking and didn't make sense. She ordered them to follow the rules and not use force unless it's really necessary.

Stricter Rules on Use of Force

The judge had already told the agents not to use tear gas and other weapons against people who aren't causing trouble. Now, she's making that order even stronger. Agents have to give two warnings before using any force. They also can't arrest people just for not following orders unless they've broken the law.

Judge Unconvinced by Agents' Explanations

The judge wasn't convinced by the agents' explanations. She said they didn't provide good reasons for their actions. She also noted that the agents' behavior didn't stop after her initial order. The judge even mentioned that some agents lied about what happened during protests.

Protection for Journalists

The judge's order also affects journalists. Agents can't use force against them and can only ask them to move if it's reasonable. All agents have to wear identification and turn on their body cameras, except in certain situations like undercover work.

Government's Response

The government isn't happy with the judge's decision. They said it's extreme and puts law enforcement at risk. But the people who sued the government, including a reverend who was hit with less-lethal ammunition, are happy with the ruling.

Judge's Criticism of Government

The judge started the hearing by reading a poem about Chicago, saying the city isn't as chaotic as the government makes it seem. She also criticized the government for how they describe people who oppose immigration enforcement.

Case Not Over Yet

The case isn't over yet. The judge mentioned that one of the agents admitted to lying. The plaintiffs' attorney said that lies will eventually catch up to you. Everyone has to go back to court in a week to talk about any violations of the judge's rules.

questions

    What measures can be implemented to ensure that federal agents adhere to the injunction and prevent future misuse of force?
    If federal agents have to issue two warnings before using tear gas, does that mean they have to say 'I'm going to tear gas you' twice or can they just yell 'Surprise!'?
    Is there any evidence to suggest that the judge's ruling was influenced by external factors or political motivations?

actions