Finland's Forest Strategy: When Words Don't Match Actions

Finland is known for its vast forests. But when it comes to the EU Forest Strategy 2030, the country is taking its time. Why? The strategy focuses on environmental benefits and forests as carbon sinks. But Finland, like other timber-focused countries, is cautious. The EU Forest Strategy is not a law. But it does come with rules that are legally binding. So, why the delay? Finland uses a tactic called \"all talk, little action. \" They say they support the strategy. But in reality, they're not doing much about it. Finland has reasons for this delay. They believe the EU doesn't understand their forestry expertise or needs. They also emphasize private property rights and national sovereignty. But is this just an excuse? This situation shows a big problem. Countries can make promises on climate and biodiversity. But in practice, they might not follow through. It's a gap between what they say and what they do. Forests are crucial for fighting climate change. They absorb carbon dioxide. But if countries don't act, these benefits are at risk. It's a critical issue that needs attention.