Finland's Forest Strategy: When Words Don't Match Actions

Finland, renowned for its expansive forests, is taking a cautious approach to the EU Forest Strategy 2030. The strategy emphasizes environmental benefits and forests as carbon sinks. However, Finland, along with other timber-focused countries, is proceeding with deliberation.

The EU Forest Strategy: A Non-Legal but Binding Framework

Although the EU Forest Strategy is not a law, it includes rules that are legally binding. So, why the delay? Finland employs a tactic known as "all talk, little action." They express support for the strategy but have not taken significant steps to implement it.

Finland's Reasons for Delay

Finland has several reasons for this delay:

• Lack of Understanding: They believe the EU does not fully grasp Finland's forestry expertise or needs.
• Private Property Rights: They emphasize the importance of private property rights.
• National Sovereignty: They stress the need for national sovereignty in decision-making.

The Gap Between Promises and Actions

This situation highlights a significant issue: countries can make promises regarding climate and biodiversity, but in practice, they may not follow through. There is a notable gap between what they say and what they do.

The Critical Role of Forests

Forests are vital for combating climate change as they absorb carbon dioxide. However, if countries do not act, these benefits are at risk. It is a critical issue that requires immediate attention.