SCIENCE

Fish Maw Identification: Can AI Help?

Beihai, ChinaFri Nov 15 2024
Fish maw, a prized delicacy with varying prices and medicinal benefits, can be tricky to identify. Scientists recently combined two powerful tools—Wasserstein generative adversarial networks (WGAN-GP) and spectral fusion—to improve how we recognize different types of fish maw. They collected data from Raman and near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy of four fish maw types: Beihai Male, Beihai Female, Yellow Croaker, and Red Mouth Croaker. By using WGAN-GP for data augmentation, they boosted their dataset from 300 to 3, 600 samples. They then tested three fusion strategies—data layer, feature layer, and decision layer—on two types of one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1D-CNN), VGG and ResNet. The results? All models performed better after data augmentation. The best models were 1D-VGG (Raman)-1D-VGG (NIR) at the feature layer and 1D-ResNet (Raman)(1. 0)-1D-ResNet (NIR)(1. 0) at the decision layer, both achieving over 98% accuracy. This study shows how data enhancement and multimodal spectral data fusion can significantly improve fish maw identification, paving the way for better detection tools.

questions

    If fish maw could talk, what would they say about being analyzed with spectral data fusion?
    Do fish maw types have favorite spectral frequencies they prefer to be identified by?
    What impact could potential biases in the training data have on the recognition accuracy?

actions