POLITICS

Five Years On: The Unfinished Fight Against Police Immunity

USAMon May 26 2025
Five years have passed since George Floyd's death. This event sparked a wave of support for changing a legal rule called "qualified immunity. " This rule often shields police officers from being held accountable, even when they break the law. Many people hoped this would lead to big changes. However, progress has been slow. The push for change gained traction quickly. Lawmakers introduced bills to get rid of qualified immunity. The Supreme Court received numerous cases asking for a review of the rule. There was a lot of talk and debate. Yet, despite all the attention, nothing significant has happened. Congress has not passed any laws to reform or abolish qualified immunity. The Supreme Court has turned down many cases asking for a change. Why has so little changed? One reason might be the complexity of the issue. Qualified immunity is a long-standing legal principle. It's designed to protect officers from being sued too easily. Changing it requires careful consideration. Another reason could be political resistance. Some argue that getting rid of qualified immunity could make it harder to recruit and retain police officers. The upcoming anniversary of Floyd's death serves as a reminder of the unfinished work. It's a chance to reflect on what has been done and what still needs to be done. The fight for police accountability is far from over. It's a battle that requires ongoing effort and attention. The public must keep pushing for change. Lawmakers and the courts need to take bold steps. Only then can there be real progress in holding police officers accountable for their actions. The debate around qualified immunity is not just about legal technicalities. It's about trust and justice. When police officers are not held accountable, it erodes public trust. It sends a message that some lives matter more than others. This is a critical issue that affects everyone. It's time to have an honest conversation about how to make the system fairer and more just for all.

questions

    What are the primary obstacles preventing Congress from passing legislation to reform qualified immunity?
    Why do politicians treat qualified immunity like a game of hot potato, always passing it to someone else?
    Could the Supreme Court's repeated rejection of qualified immunity cases be part of a larger conspiracy to maintain the status quo?

actions