Fixing Alaska's Fish and Wildlife Management Mess

Alaska's fish and wildlife management has been a hot topic for years. The current system, with its dual management approach, has caused a lot of confusion and problems. Hunters and fishermen often find themselves bewildered by conflicting rules on the same lands and waterways. This has led to poor enforcement and even damage to fish and wildlife populations. The Safari Club International (SCI) has stepped in with a proposal. They want to see a single, science-based management system under the state. This would replace the current dual management system, which has been causing headaches for decades. The SCI's proposal aims to reinforce rural subsistence priorities while also upholding equal access guaranteed under the Alaska Constitution.The current system has led to federal closures of huge areas to non-rural Alaskans. Often, these closures lack a solid scientific basis. This has shrunk participation and funding, which are crucial for keeping wildlife thriving. The SCI argues that a unified, data-driven system under the state would be fairer and more effective. The SCI Kenai Chapter is clear: they respect ANILCA's rural priority and stand with rural subsistence hunters. Many of their members are subsistence users themselves. They've even teamed up with the SCI Alaska Chapter to aid storm-displaced Yup'ik families. This shows that hunters, regardless of their background, can come together for a common cause. Alaska's story is complex, but the path forward is clear. Alaskans need to unite for sustainable management. Divisive narratives won't solve the problem. The SCI Kenai Chapter will continue advocating for policies that ensure Alaska's wildlife remains abundant for every Alaskan who relies on it.