POLITICS
Food Stamp Fight: Who Gets to Decide?
USAFri Nov 07 2025
Government vs. Judge: Who Pays?
The government wants to pay less, but a judge says no. Here's what's going on:
- Government's Move: Stopped full food stamp payments this month, citing lack of funds.
- Judge's Response: Ordered the government to use other funds to pay people fully.
- Government's Reaction: Asked a higher court to block the judge's order.
The Backstory
- Government Shutdown: Congress couldn't agree on a budget.
- Past Precedents: Food stamps were usually unaffected during shutdowns.
- This Time: Payments were cut, leading to a lawsuit by cities, charities, and businesses.
The Judge's Ruling
- Reasoning: People were going hungry, food banks were struggling.
- Order: Government must use all available funds to pay people fully.
- Government's Stance: Wanted to use only a special emergency fund.
- Judge's Decision: Rejected the government's plan, allowing use of other funds.
The Next Steps
- Higher Court's Action: Asked suing groups to respond quickly.
- Deadline: Until noon to explain why the government shouldn't pay less.
Why It Matters
- Impact: People rely on food stamps to eat.
- Judge's Stand: Government's actions didn't match their words.
continue reading...
questions
What are the ethical implications of the Trump administration's decision to withhold full SNAP benefits during a government shutdown?
Is there a hidden agenda behind the administration's refusal to use Section 32 funds for SNAP benefits?
Could the Trump administration's actions be part of a larger plan to dismantle social safety nets?
actions
flag content