POLITICS
Frozen Funds: The Battle Over Electric Vehicle Money
Washington DC, USAFri May 23 2025
The Trump administration is in a heated debate with a government watchdog over funds meant for electric vehicle charging stations. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report claiming that the Trump administration is breaking the law by not spending money as directed by Congress. The funds in question come from the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Act, totaling $5 billion. This money was earmarked for electric vehicle charging stations, but the administration has put a stop to it, leaving states in limbo with their construction plans.
The GAO's report argues that the Trump administration should have followed a formal process to cut these funds. This process involves getting Congress's approval, rather than just unilaterally stopping the spending. The administration, however, sees things differently. Russ Vought, the budget director, dismissed the GAO's findings, calling them "non-events with no consequence. " He believes the GAO is trying to hinder the administration's efforts to manage taxpayer dollars effectively.
The Constitution gives Congress the power to control government spending. This power was reinforced by the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which was passed after disputes with President Richard Nixon. This law requires presidents to spend money as Congress directs. Trump has previously stated his intention to challenge this law, and Vought has been a strong advocate for this stance. In fact, during Trump's first term, Vought was involved in a similar dispute over aid to Ukraine, which eventually led to Trump's first impeachment.
The fight over these funds is just the latest in a series of battles over government spending. Senator Patty Murray, a Democrat from Washington, has been vocal in her criticism of the administration's actions. She argues that the Constitution is clear: Congress, not the president, has the power of the purse. As of April, the GAO was investigating 39 other potential instances of impoundment under the Trump administration. This issue is expected to eventually make its way to the Supreme Court.
Several states have already taken legal action against the Trump administration over the paused funds for electric vehicle charging. The Impoundment Control Act allows the GAO to sue the president if it finds a violation of the law. However, the GAO has not indicated whether it will take this step in this case. The outcome of this debate could have significant implications for how future presidents manage government spending.
continue reading...
questions
What steps can Congress take to ensure that the Trump administration complies with the Impoundment Control Act?
If the GAO is so partisan, why does the White House keep getting caught by their 'non-events'?
If the GAO report is just 'rearview mirror stuff,' why is the White House spending so much time looking in the rearview mirror?
actions
flag content