ENTERTAINMENT

Glastonbury Gaffe: BBC Admits Big Mistake

UKThu Jul 03 2025

The BBC is facing criticism after a controversial performance at Glastonbury. The broadcaster has apologized for allowing the band Bob Vylan to perform live despite knowing the act was risky. The performance included offensive content, prompting a formal apology from the BBC.

BBC's Apology and New Measures

Tim Davie, the BBC's Director-General, sent a message to his team expressing his apologies for the offensive content. He specifically apologized to Jewish colleagues and the Jewish community, reiterating that there is no place for antisemitism at the BBC.

As a result of this incident, the BBC has implemented new measures:

  • No more risky acts will be allowed to perform live.
  • More staff will be present at major music festivals to ensure smooth operations.
  • Clearer guidelines will be provided on when to stop a live stream if something goes wrong.

Performance Details and Viewer Warnings

During the performance, the BBC attempted to warn viewers about the content but did not cut the feed, which they now admit was a mistake. Davie, who was present at Glastonbury, quickly instructed his team to stop the performance from being shown again. The performance was removed from BBC iPlayer and Sounds, but the live feed continued for a while.

Samir Shah, the Chair of the BBC, also issued an apology. He expressed his regret to viewers, especially the Jewish community, for allowing the offensive content to be broadcast. Shah praised Davie for his swift action and mentioned that the BBC board convened to discuss the incident.

A Lesson in Inclusivity and Tolerance

This incident has been a significant embarrassment for the BBC. Davie emphasized the BBC's commitment to being a beacon of inclusivity and tolerance, ensuring that everyone feels supported and safe.

questions

    What criteria will the BBC use to classify acts as 'high risk' and what mitigations will be put in place?
    Is there evidence to suggest that the BBC was aware of the antisemitic content beforehand and allowed it to air deliberately?
    What role does editorial policy support play in preventing the broadcast of controversial content, and how can it be improved?

actions