POLITICS
Global Response to U. S. Strikes on Iran: A Mixed Bag
Middle EastSun Jun 22 2025
The United States' decision to strike Iran's nuclear facilities sparked a wide range of reactions worldwide. Some countries expressed alarm and called for restraint, while others saw it as a necessary move. The Middle East, in particular, had a varied response.
In Saudi Arabia, officials watched the events unfold with serious worry, pushing for urgent diplomatic efforts. Meanwhile, Iraq and Qatar both issued warnings, highlighting the risk of further instability in an already tense region. Pakistan also chimed in, condemning the strikes and pointing out the potential for severe regional consequences.
Iran's allies and regional proxies were more vocal. The Houthi movement in Yemen labeled the strikes as cowardly and vowed to stand firm. They saw the U. S. move as a direct threat to their alliances. Hamas, the Palestinian group, also condemned the strikes, viewing them as a threat to global peace and security.
Israel, on the other hand, was thrilled with the U. S. action. Leaders there saw it as a crucial step in eliminating what they consider an existential threat. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu thanked President Trump, emphasizing the coordinated effort between the two nations. Even members of the political opposition in Israel backed the move, dismissing critics as misguided.
Europe took a more measured approach. The United Kingdom's Prime Minister Keir Starmer supported the strikes but urged a return to diplomacy. France expressed concern but clarified that it was not involved in the strikes. Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz called for immediate negotiations between Iran, Israel, and the United States.
The United Nations and Russia also weighed in. U. N. Secretary-General António Guterres condemned the use of force, warning of catastrophic consequences. The International Atomic Energy Agency planned an emergency meeting to assess the situation. Russia strongly condemned the strikes, labeling them as irresponsible and a violation of international law.
President Trump framed the strikes as a success, claiming that Iran's nuclear capacity had been destroyed. He warned that future attacks would be even more severe if Iran did not pursue peace. This bold move by the U. S. has certainly stirred the pot, with reactions ranging from praise to condemnation.
continue reading...
questions
What evidence supports the claim that the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were a necessary measure to ensure global security?
How does one become a 'useful idiot' according to Yair Lapid, and is there a training program for it?
How might the international community's response to the U.S. strikes on Iran shape future diplomatic efforts in the region?
actions
flag content