POLITICS
Government Health Workers: The Unseen Casualties of a Purge
Washington, D.C., USAWed Feb 19 2025
Working hard to make sure seniors get affordable medicines, or to stop dangerous chemicals from getting into our food. Imagine fighting to lower the high maternal death rates in America. These were the jobs of thousands of dedicated government employees. But suddenly, they found themselves out of work. Why? Because of a big shake-up in the federal government, led by a billionaire advisor and his team.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said the goal was to make things more efficient. But it seems like many important jobs were lost in the process. People who worked on Medicare, the program for elderly and disabled Americans, were also sent home. Some even worked on a new program to lower drug prices. This doesn't seem very efficient, does it?
The firings were chaotic. Employees got letters saying their skills didn't fit the agency's needs, even if they had great performance reviews. Managers had little say in who stayed and who went. It felt like a random purge, not a thoughtful plan.
The dismissed workers were mostly those who had been in their jobs less than a year or two. But many of them were veterans who had switched jobs within the government, restarting their probation period. About 5, 000 workers at HHS were affected, which is a big chunk of the department.
The workers who spoke out said they understood the need for efficiency. But firing so many people who were working on important projects, like safeguarding federal money or improving health outcomes, seems counterproductive. It's like cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Some workers were part of a project to improve maternal health by supporting doulas and midwives through Medicaid. This project could save money and improve lives, but it just lost four full-time workers. More layoffs are expected, which could cripple the project.
The workers also pointed out that many teams were already understaffed. Losing more employees could slow down progress and even cause breakdowns in services. They questioned the logic of firing so many people who were working on important tasks.
The administration's actions could lead to legal trouble. A nonprofit group has already filed a complaint, and lawsuits might follow. The administration has been making life difficult for federal workers in other ways too, like forcing some to work remotely.
The workers who spoke out said they were dedicated to their jobs and loved serving the country. They saw themselves as smart, decent people who wanted to make a difference. They were bewildered by the administration's portrayal of them as part of a "deep state" trying to thwart the president's agenda.
Even if the courts step in or the administration reverses some decisions, the damage might already be done. The turmoil could scare away talented workers for good, leading to a "brain drain" from the government to the private sector. Attracting new talent will be even harder with the prospect of instability and hostility.
continue reading...
questions
How does the dismissal of career government employees align with the stated goal of 'restructuring and streamlining the federal government'?
How can the administration ensure that the dismissed employees were truly 'not adequate' for their roles, given the reported strong performance reviews?
If DOGE is about efficiency, why not start by firing people who send out dismissal letters with incorrect employment details?
source
actions
flag content