HEALTH
Health Groups Challenge HHS Over Sudden Vaccine Policy Shifts
USA, WashingtonTue Jul 08 2025
A group of medical organizations has taken legal action against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its leader, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. They claim that recent changes to vaccine policies are not only sudden but also lack proper legal backing. The lawsuit, filed in a Massachusetts court, involves major groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Physicians.
The core issue is that HHS and Kennedy have made significant changes to vaccine recommendations without following standard procedures. For example, they removed the entire advisory panel of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and replaced it with new members. The medical groups argue that this move was arbitrary and could harm public health.
One of the plaintiffs is a pregnant woman who works in a hospital. She wants to get the COVID-19 vaccine but fears she won't be able to due to the new recommendations. The medical groups say these changes make it harder for doctors to advise patients and could increase the risk of serious illnesses.
The lawsuit also highlights concerns about the new members of the CDC's advisory committee. Some of these members have previously expressed doubts about vaccines, which contradicts Kennedy's claim that the new panel is not anti-vaccine. The medical groups worry that these changes could undermine public trust in vaccines and make communities more vulnerable to preventable diseases.
The HHS has defended Kennedy's actions, stating that the changes are part of reforms to restore public confidence in vaccine science. However, the medical groups argue that these reforms are not based on evidence and could have serious consequences for public health.
continue reading...
questions
If vaccines were a political party, which one would they be and why?
What specific harms do the medical organizations foresee from Kennedy's changes to vaccine recommendations?
How do the plaintiffs' arguments align with the Administrative Procedure Act's guidelines?
BASED ON
actions
flag content