Hong Kong's High-Rise Fire: A Test for Beijing's Control

A devastating fire in a Hong Kong apartment building has left at least 55 people dead and nearly 300 missing. This tragedy comes at a time when Beijing's control over Hong Kong is already under scrutiny. The city has seen significant political changes since the 2019 pro-democracy protests, with elections now limited to "patriotic" candidates and many critics silenced. The fire broke out just as Hong Kong prepares for the sentencing of Jimmy Lai, a prominent media tycoon and pro-democracy figure. This event could further test Beijing's grip on the city. Political scientist Sonny Lo noted that Beijing is closely watching how the government handles this tragedy and whether it affects public perception of the authorities. Both the Hong Kong government and China's Communist Party have shown urgency in responding to the disaster. Police quickly targeted the construction company responsible for renovations, highlighting concerns about safety standards. High property prices in Hong Kong have long been a source of discontent, and this tragedy could fuel more resentment despite the government's efforts to tighten control. Residents have questioned whether safety risks were ignored, pointing to faulty fire alarms, workers smoking cigarettes, and the use of traditional bamboo scaffolding. Some criticized what they saw as negligence and cost-cutting as causes of the fire. Chinese President Xi Jinping urged an "all-out effort" to extinguish the fire and minimize casualties, expressing sympathy for the victims' families. Hong Kong leader John Lee prioritized extinguishing the fire, rescuing trapped residents, and supporting the injured. However, just hours after his news conference, police announced the cause of the fire's spread and arrested three officials from the construction company. The use of protective mesh, plastic, and foam materials that may not meet fire standards has raised serious concerns about safety regulations. While protests are tightly controlled in Hong Kong, online forums remain accessible and could offer early insights into public sentiment. Analysts suggest that anger and concern may extend beyond the construction firms to the government's fire safety and building regulators. Pressure is likely to build for thorough and transparent investigations into the incident. Historically, the Hong Kong government has conducted open inquiries into large-scale tragedies, often led by an independent judge. A similar inquiry in 1996 led to new building and fire safety laws. However, experts believe a more extensive review of fire safety and site management across the entire industry is needed, including government oversight.