HEALTH

Hormone Therapy for Menopause: A Shift in Perspective?

USAThu Oct 02 2025

The FDA is evaluating potential modifications to the strictest warning labels on hormone replacement therapies for menopause symptoms. This consideration follows years of debate regarding the risks and benefits of these treatments.

Current Warnings and Their Impact

The black box warning, the most severe type of alert, has been in place since 2003. It underscores increased risks of cancers, strokes, blood clots, and dementia for women using estrogen-based therapies. These warnings were based on a large study from the late 1990s, which identified higher risks for women taking estrogen pills post-menopause.

After the warning's introduction, prescriptions for these therapies plummeted by over 70%. Many women discontinued use, despite the therapies' effectiveness in managing symptoms like hot flashes and mood swings. This has resulted in the undertreatment of menopausal symptoms, which can be severe.

Emerging Evidence and Expert Opinions

Recent analyses suggest that hormone therapy may be safer and more beneficial when initiated before age 60 or within 10 years of menopause. Experts argue that the current warning is overly broad and may hinder access to effective treatments.

Some forms of hormone therapy, such as low-dose vaginal estrogen, may not elevate cancer risks. Nevertheless, the black box warning persists for all estrogen-based therapies, a point experts contend is erroneous. They advocate for removing the warning for therapies with a more favorable risk-benefit profile.

FDA Meeting and Ongoing Debate

In July, the FDA convened a meeting to address these concerns. Experts urged the agency to remove the warning label, asserting that it is detrimental to women by obstructing access to beneficial therapies. However, not all experts concur. Some advocate for additional research to fully comprehend the long-term effects of hormone therapy.

Individualized Treatment and Future Steps

Women's health experts stress the importance of personalized treatment. They encourage women to consult their doctors about hormone therapy, weighing individual health risks and benefits. The aim is to strike a balance between managing menopausal symptoms and mitigating potential risks.

questions

    What are the ethical implications of changing the black box warning based on newer analyses of an old study?
    Are there hidden agendas behind the push to remove the black box warning, such as financial gains for certain medical professionals?
    How do different forms of hormone replacement therapy (pills, patches, sprays, creams) vary in their risks and benefits?

actions