HEALTH
How Garadacimab Might Be a Better Option for Hereditary Angioedema Patients
Fri Jul 11 2025
Introduction
Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare condition characterized by painful swelling. Two treatments, garadacimab and lanadelumab, were evaluated to determine which is more effective.
Study Design
- Garadacimab: Administered once a month.
- Lanadelumab: Administered either every two weeks or every four weeks.
- Method: Researchers used matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) due to the lack of direct comparisons.
Key Metrics Evaluated
- Frequency of HAE attacks
- Attacks requiring additional treatment
- Moderate or severe attacks
- Attack-free patients
- Quality of life improvements
Results
Garadacimab vs. Lanadelumab (Every Two Weeks)
- Significant reduction in moderate and severe attacks.
- Improved quality of life.
Garadacimab vs. Lanadelumab (Every Four Weeks)
- Fewer attacks
- Fewer attacks needing extra treatment
- Fewer moderate or severe attacks
- More attack-free patients
- Better quality of life
Conclusion
- Garadacimab shows potential as a better long-term treatment option for HAE.
- Note: This is an indirect comparison; direct head-to-head trials are needed to confirm findings.
continue reading...
questions
Do patients with HAE prefer garadacimab because it has a cooler name, or is it just more effective?
How do the confidence intervals in this study impact the reliability of the results?
What are the limitations of using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons in this context?
actions
flag content