HEALTH

How Real-World Data Shapes Medicine Approval

North America, Europe, AustraliaTue Jun 10 2025
Real-world evidence (RWE) is becoming a big deal in the world of medicine. It's used to back up the effectiveness of new drugs and treatments. But how exactly does it influence decisions made by regulatory bodies and health tech assessors? This is a tricky question. To find out, a special tool called FRAME was created. FRAME stands for Framework for Real-world evidence Assessment to Mitigate Evidence uncertainties for efficacy/effectiveness. It looks at how RWE is used in different places like North America, Europe, and Australia. First, let's talk about what FRAME does. It gathers info on medicines that used RWE to show they work. Then, it checks out how this evidence was used in real decisions. The goal is to see what makes RWE strong or weak in these cases. FRAME was tested on 15 key examples out of 87 possible cases. These examples covered 68 submissions and 76 RWE studies across 11 different authorities. The results were interesting. There was a lot of variation in how RWE was judged. Some places gave it more weight than others. This makes it hard to compare and learn from these decisions. One big finding was that when RWE was seen as primary evidence, it had a big impact. This means that if RWE is strong and clear, it can really sway a decision. But there was also a problem with the details. The reports often lacked specific info, making it tough to analyze. Another issue was the limited use of advanced study designs. Most RWE studies were pretty basic, which might not give the full picture. So, what can be done to improve this? There are five main suggestions. First, make the assessment reports more detailed. This will help everyone learn from past decisions. Second, standardize how RWE is evaluated. This way, there's less variation and more consistency. Third, encourage the use of advanced study designs. This can make RWE more reliable. Fourth, clarify the value of RWE. This will help everyone understand its role better. Finally, gather more evidence to support decision-making. This will make the process stronger and more reliable. In the end, RWE is a powerful tool. But it needs to be used wisely. By following these suggestions, the use of RWE can be improved. This will lead to better decisions and ultimately, better healthcare. It's all about making the most of the data we have. After all, real-world evidence comes from real people. Their experiences matter, and they should be part of the conversation.

questions

    Is the positive association between positive comments and RWE impact a manipulated outcome to push certain products through?
    If advanced RWE study designs were a dance, would regulatory agencies and HTAbs be ready to tango?
    Are the inconsistencies in RWE assessment across agencies a result of hidden agendas rather than genuine differences in evaluation methods?

actions