POLITICS

How To Catch the Ear of Climate-Skeptic Politicians

USAMon Apr 07 2025
Politicians in the US often dismiss climate change. They have a hard time hearing scientists' solutions. Scientists know a lot about climate change. But they struggle to reach politicians. The main issue is not finding answers. It is about getting politicians to listen. There is plenty of research on climate change communication. But few studies focus on a key group: policymakers. It is crucial to test methods that can grab their attention. Scientists need to find ways to make politicians care about climate research. A group of researchers did just that. They sent emails to US policymakers. The emails had a fact sheet about climate change. They tested three common tactics to boost engagement. These tactics were: using social norms, focusing on numbers, and using emotional language. The researchers did four trials. Each trial had thousands of participants. They found something surprising. The control message worked better than the tactics. Politicians clicked on the fact sheet more when the email was simple and straightforward. This shows that testing communication methods is vital. It is especially important when dealing with powerful people. Politicians have a big say in climate policy. So, scientists need to find the best ways to reach them. Scientists must think critically about how they talk to politicians. They should test different methods. This way, they can find what works best. It is not just about having the right information. It is about getting the right people to listen. Politicians need to understand the importance of climate change. Scientists have the knowledge. They just need to find the right way to share it. This is a big challenge. But it is one that scientists must tackle. The future of the planet depends on it.

questions

    What are the potential biases in the email trials that could affect the interpretation of the results?
    Could the email trials be manipulated to show different results, and if so, by whom?
    What specific elements of the control message contributed to its higher engagement rates compared to the advocacy tactics?

actions