SCIENCE
How We Judge What's Real: The Science Behind Trusting News
Thu May 15 2025
Trust is a big deal. It's not just about who you hang out with. It's also about what you read and hear. Figuring out what's true and what's not can be tough. This is especially true in today's world. There's so much information out there. Some of it is straight-up lies. Other times, it's just biased. So, how do we figure out who to trust?
A recent study took a close look at this. They created a task. People had to deal with different types of information. Some sources lied. Others were biased. The goal was to learn who to trust. They did this with something called Bayesian models. These models help show how people learn. They show how we figure out what's true and what's not.
The findings were interesting. People can learn to trust or not trust sources. They do this even when the feedback is noisy. This means even when the information is mixed up. People can still figure out who to trust. However, they struggle more when the noise is high. This is when the information is very mixed up.
The study also showed something else. People start with a belief. They believe sources are helpful. This is their prior belief. It's what they think before they get any new information. This belief helps them figure out who to trust. But it can also make things harder. It can make it tougher to spot biases.
So, what does this all mean? It means people are pretty good at figuring out who to trust. But it's not always easy. Especially when the information is mixed up. And when sources have a bias, it can be even harder. This is something to think about. The next time you read or hear something, ask yourself. Is this true? Or is it just biased?
continue reading...
questions
How do varying degrees of feedback influence the accuracy of trust assessments in different types of information sources?
Could the Bayesian models used in this study be manipulated to deliberately mislead participants about the trustworthiness of certain sources?
Are there hidden agendas behind the types of feedback provided in the study, and how might they affect the results?
inspired by
actions
flag content