SCIENCE

Is it fair to let grant applicants review others' work?

Fri Jul 11 2025

In the world of research funding, a new idea is being put to the test.

What is Distributed Peer Review?

Distributed peer review is a method where researchers applying for grants also review the applications of others. This approach aims to involve more researchers in the decision-making process.

How Does It Work?

  • Traditional Method: A small group of experts reviews the applications.
  • Distributed Peer Review: Many more people get a say in who receives funding.

Potential Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Increased Involvement: More researchers have a chance to participate.
  • Broader Perspective: Diverse viewpoints may lead to fairer decisions.

Drawbacks

  • Expertise Concerns: Not all reviewers may have the same level of expertise.
  • Time Constraints: Reviewing others' work might take time away from personal research.

Key Questions to Consider

  1. Fairness: Does distributed peer review make the process fairer, or does it complicate things?
  2. Quality of Reviews: With more reviewers, will the quality of reviews improve, or will they be too varied to compare?
  3. Impact on Researchers: Does reviewing others' work help researchers learn more, or does it hinder their own progress?

Conclusion

Only time will tell if distributed peer review is the future of research funding. But it's certainly an interesting idea worth exploring.

continue reading...

questions

    How can potential biases in the review process be identified and mitigated when competitors are involved?
    How can the process of distributed peer review be standardized to ensure consistency and reliability?
    What if the competitors' proposals were judged by a panel of trained squirrels instead of human reviewers?

actions

flag content