Justice Served: The End of a Long Legal Battle

In a dramatic turn of events, a woman who falsely claimed to be Madeleine McCann faced the consequences of her actions. The courtroom was tense as the judge considered a request to ban her from entering Leicestershire indefinitely.

• Prosecution argued for a broad scope.
• Defense countered that it was too extensive.

The final decision now rests with Judge Mrs. Justice Cutts.

Key Developments

The court also heard that the woman, known as Wandelt, is likely to be deported after the hearing. Her phones, which she expressed a desire to keep, will be confiscated and destroyed.

• The atmosphere in the courtroom was heavy.
• Wandelt's sobs echoed through the halls as she awaited her sentence.
• Karen Spragg, another defendant, sat in the public gallery, seemingly unfazed by the proceedings.

The Defendants

Wandelt and Spragg, dressed in a teal jumper and a black blazer respectively, sat together in the dock, holding hands. Their demeanor was a stark contrast to the beginning of the trial five weeks prior.

• The jury's deliberation lasted about seven-and-a-half hours before the court reconvened for the verdicts.
• Sentencing for Wandelt is set to take place at 12:15 GMT today.
• Judge Mrs. Justice Cutts reminded the court that harassment carries a maximum sentence of six months.
• Wandelt has been in custody since her arrest in February.

As Karen Spragg left the court, she sobbed, having been found not guilty. Her packed bag, a burgundy holdall, remained unused.

Case Significance

The case has drawn significant attention, highlighting the complexities of harassment laws and the emotional toll on all parties involved.

• The courtroom drama unfolded as the judge weighed the evidence and the defense's arguments.
• The verdict marks a significant moment in the long legal battle, bringing some closure to the McCann family and the community.