POLITICS

Keeping America Fed: SNAP Benefits and the Government Shutdown

USASun Nov 02 2025

A recent court ruling in Rhode Island has brought attention to the ongoing struggle to fund SNAP benefits during the government shutdown. Judge John J. McConnell Jr. commended President Donald Trump for his swift response to the court's order, acknowledging the president's efforts to ensure timely funding for the program.

Urgent Need for Contingency Funds

The judge's order emphasized the urgent need to use congressionally approved contingency funds to cover SNAP benefits for November. With around 42 million Americans relying on these benefits, the stakes are high. The judge made it clear that the funds must be used now, citing a previous guidance from Trump's first term that indicated these funds could be used in case of a government shutdown.

USDA's Argument Rejected

The USDA has argued that it lacks the legal authority and sufficient funds to provide full SNAP benefits for November. However, the judge rejected this argument, stating that the funds could not be used only in cases of natural disasters. The judge also noted that the USDA has $5.25 billion available in the program’s contingency fund, but ensuring full payments for November could require at least $8.5 billion.

Boston Ruling Adds Pressure

In Boston, another judge, Indira Talwani, ruled that the USDA must continue SNAP payments, describing the program’s suspension as unlawful. This ruling adds to the pressure on the USDA to comply with the court's orders. President Trump has expressed his desire to fund SNAP benefits, asking the court for legal direction on how to do so.

California Governor Urges Immediate Action

California Governor Gavin Newsom has also weighed in, stating that the Trump Administration has a legal responsibility to support the SNAP program. He urged the USDA to release all available funding for the program immediately, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that families do not go hungry.

USDA Deadline and Consequences

The USDA has been given a deadline to report to the court by noon on November 3 with a plan to comply. If full payments are not completed, partial payments are to follow by Wednesday. Failure to meet these deadlines could result in further enforcement actions.

questions

    Is there any evidence suggesting that the judge's ruling was influenced by political affiliations or external pressures?
    Could the USDA's claim of insufficient funds be a cover for a larger agenda to cut social welfare programs?
    What are the potential long-term effects on the SNAP program and its recipients if the USDA continues to argue against its legal authority to provide full benefits?

actions