Lawmakers Clash Over Military Orders and Political Rhetoric
USASun Nov 23 2025
Political tensions are heating up as President Donald Trump's recent remarks have sparked a heated debate. He accused certain Democratic lawmakers of engaging in "seditious behavior" after they released a video. This video urged military personnel to question "illegal orders. " The lawmakers involved have military or national security backgrounds.
Criticism has come from both sides of the aisle. Senator Elissa Slotkin, one of the Democrats featured in the video, called Trump's comments a "tool of fear. " She suggested that the president was trying to distract from other significant news stories. Meanwhile, Republican Representative Michael McCaul distanced himself from Trump's remarks. He advised toning down the rhetoric.
The White House has denied that Trump was threatening the lawmakers with death. Despite this, the lawmakers reported receiving numerous threats. They have had to enhance their security measures as a result. Trump continued his attacks on Saturday night. He referred to the lawmakers as "traitors" and suggested they should be in jail.
Slotkin explained that the video was made in response to concerns raised by military officers. She emphasized that questioning illegal orders is a standard practice. It is outlined in the Uniform Code of Military Justice. She also mentioned that while she was not aware of any illegal orders, there were legal concerns regarding actions in Venezuela.
McCaul, on the other hand, defended the orders related to Venezuela. He argued that they were constitutional and aimed at stopping drug trafficking. He did not believe they were illegal.
Slotkin also expressed her primary concern about the use of U. S. military within the country. She worried about potential conflicts between military personnel and American civilians. She advised service members to consult with their legal officers if they had concerns about the legality of their orders.
https://localnews.ai/article/lawmakers-clash-over-military-orders-and-political-rhetoric-9822c05b
continue reading...
questions
Could the military's refusal to follow illegal orders lead to a situation where they start their own reality TV show, 'Military Rules'?
How does the political rhetoric surrounding illegal orders impact the morale and decision-making of military personnel?
Is there a hidden agenda behind the recent focus on illegal orders, and who might benefit from this distraction?
actions
flag content