CRIME

Lawyer in Hot Water Over Suspicious Crypto Case

England, London, UKTue Sep 23 2025

A solicitor at a respected London law firm is facing disciplinary action for potential misuse of legal threats on behalf of a controversial cryptocurrency company and its missing founder.

The Case Against Claire Gill

Claire Gill, a solicitor at Carter-Ruck, is accused by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) of making an improper legal threat in 2017. Gill denies these allegations, but the case is proceeding.

Gill previously worked for OneCoin and its founder, Ruja Ignatova, also known as the "Cryptoqueen". Ignatova is wanted by the FBI and has been missing since 2017.

Initially, Gill attempted to keep OneCoin and Ignatova's names out of the proceedings. However, she withdrew this request after a ruling stated that Carter-Ruck was likely assisting OneCoin and Ignatova with fraudulent activities. This ruling means legal privilege does not apply, and their names can be used in the case.

Carter-Ruck's Defense

Carter-Ruck maintains that Gill and her team were unaware of OneCoin's fraudulent nature. They assert that they acted in good faith and adhered to their professional duties. The case is scheduled to be heard in December.

The Ongoing Search for Ruja Ignatova

Meanwhile, Ignatova remains at large. She is accused of orchestrating a $4 billion Ponzi scheme and has not been seen since 2017.

Implications for UK Lawyers

This case is significant for UK legal professionals as it is one of the first involving an alleged SLAPP suit (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation), where lawsuits are used to silence criticism. A similar case recently resulted in a substantial fine for another lawyer. This case will be closely watched by the legal community.

questions

    What steps can law firms take to ensure they do not inadvertently represent clients involved in fraudulent activities?
    How might the outcome of this case influence future legal strategies in similar scenarios involving SLAPP suits?
    How can the legal profession better regulate and prevent the misuse of legal threats to silence criticism or investigation?

actions