California’s New Pesticide Rule Backfires: More 1, 3-D Used Even After Safety Limits

California officials claimed a January 2024 rule would lower cancer risk from the chemical 1, 3‑dichloropropane (1, 3‑D) by cutting the amount that reaches the air. Instead, data show growers applied a million more pounds last year than before the rule or in 2024. Kern and San Joaquin counties saw the biggest jumps, mainly on almond and grape farms. The state’s Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) set new setback distances, required deeper soil injections in moist ground, and added tarp measures to reduce fumes. DPR officials say these steps let farmers keep using 1, 3‑D at similar levels while cutting emissions. Yet an air monitor in Delhi, California, recorded a 30 % rise in average airborne 1, 3‑D during early 2025 compared with the same period in 2024. Farmworker groups argue that 1, 3‑D is a known carcinogen and can cause acute symptoms like breathing trouble, chest pain, eye irritation, and dizziness. A Chinese greenhouse worker died in 2023 after inhaling the fumigant. Forty countries have banned it, but California still permits its use.The new rule created two different safety limits: one for residents and another for workers, effective in 2026. Critics say this split ignores the fact that farmworkers live and work right next to treated fields, exposing them to higher levels of the chemical. In Kern County, one township already exceeded its old annual cap before the new rule removed it entirely. Advocates have sued, protested, and filed legal briefs demanding that DPR meet its duty to protect public health. They claim the regulations miss their purpose and allow continued use of a dangerous pesticide without adequately reducing risk. DPR’s plan to speed up sustainable pest management lists no priority chemicals, leaving farmers without clear guidance. The rising use of 1, 3‑D after the rule’s implementation suggests that the intended safety gains have not materialized.