Colorado's Coal Conundrum: A Costly Detour

The recent decision to keep the Craig coal power plant running longer is a step backward for Colorado. It ignores science, harms the environment, and will likely raise electricity bills. This move is part of a pattern of disregarding expert advice and economic realities. The plant was supposed to close by 2025. Utilities had already planned to replace it with cleaner, cheaper options. Keeping it open goes against these plans and could cost consumers more in the long run. It also puts our health at risk, as coal plants contribute to pollution and respiratory issues.Colorado has been working towards cleaner energy. The state has plans in place to transition away from coal, considering both costs and the well-being of workers and residents. However, the recent decision to keep the plant open undermines these efforts. The decision seems more about politics than sound policy. It's a short-sighted move that could have real consequences for Colorado's environment and economy. It's important to remember that our actions today will shape the future for generations to come. Environmental groups are fighting this decision in court. Meanwhile, lawmakers are working to protect the state from what they see as harmful federal interference. The outcome of these efforts remains uncertain, but the stakes are high.