Colorado's Gas Pipeline Rules: Are They Strong Enough?

Colorado's recent push to tighten its rules on natural gas pipelines has sparked debate. The state's Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has backed most of the recommendations from an administrative law judge. These rules aim to strengthen the regulation of the vast network of gas pipelines crisscrossing the state. The new rules focus on several key areas. They require companies to use advanced technology to detect pipeline leaks. They also set levels of methane emissions that need action and timelines for checking different types of pipelines. However, not everyone is happy with the new rules. Local governments and environmental groups say the PUC didn't go far enough. They argue that the rules don't prioritize public health and environmental protection as much as they should. Erin Murphy, an attorney with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), expressed concern. She said the rules might not be strong enough in some areas. For example, the frequency of required pipeline surveys might not be high enough. The EDF has been advocating for stronger rules. They argue that advanced monitoring technologies are already available and effective. These technologies can help detect and repair leaks more efficiently. Xcel Energy, one of the major players in the state's natural gas industry, has responded to the criticism. They say they are committed to reducing methane emissions. They have already piloted advanced leak detection technology in Colorado. The push for stronger pipeline regulations comes at a time of increased drilling and distribution of natural gas. There has also been a rise in the construction of homes and businesses near pipelines. This has raised concerns about public safety and environmental impact. A state audit in 2023 highlighted the need for tougher regulations. The audit found widespread problems with pipeline oversight. It revealed inadequate inspections and a lack of action against repeat offenders. This included cases where explosions had caused deaths and injuries.Industry groups have urged the PUC to hold off on new rules. They argue that a federal agency is in the process of updating its own rules. They warn of potential conflicts between state and federal regulations. Despite these concerns, the Colorado General Assembly has passed a bill requiring the state to complete its new rules by November 1st. This shows the state's commitment to improving pipeline safety and environmental protection. The federal pipeline agency, PHMSA, oversees interstate pipelines and oil lines in sensitive areas. It can certify states to regulate intrastate pipelines. Colorado currently oversees its own natural gas pipelines within its borders. Matt Sura, an attorney representing Larimer County, has raised concerns about the new rules. He argues that the threshold for leak detection might not be rigorous enough. This could mean smaller leaks go undetected, posing a risk to public health and the environment. Xcel Energy and other companies have argued for flexibility in the rules. They say stricter requirements would be costly and burdensome. They also argue that such rules would not necessarily advance public safety or environmental protection. Sura disagrees. He says lower thresholds for leak detection are important. They can help Colorado meet its goals for cutting methane emissions. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, trapping heat in the atmosphere. Colorado has been a leader in methane regulations. In 2014, it approved the first state-level methane regulations in the country. Since then, it has continued to strengthen its requirements. The debate over Colorado's pipeline rules is far from over. While the PUC has backed most of the new rules, the final decision is still pending. The outcome will have significant implications for public safety and environmental protection in the state.