Local Schools Seek More Control Over Charter Budgets

In Charleston County, a group of school leaders wants state lawmakers to give local districts more say in how charter schools use their money. Daniel Prentice, the district’s chief finance officer, is urging representatives to add a clause that would require charter budgets to be approved by the county school board. The push comes after a year of friction, because the district funds nine charter schools—more than any other local district in South Carolina. Critics say these charters get a large share of property‑tax money but don’t face the same level of oversight as traditional public schools. Prentice argues that a clearer legal framework would keep charter spending transparent while still letting the schools run themselves. The bill, which passed the Senate unanimously in February, is now before a House subcommittee that has been busy with budget matters. At a public hearing, Prentice explained how the current law allows charter applications to be approved automatically after 90 days unless a district steps in. He proposes extending that period to 120 days and adding reporting requirements for finances, staffing, curriculum, facilities and safety.Supporters say these steps would prevent problems like the 2019 revocation of Prestige Preparatory Academy, whose budget overestimated enrollment. Opponents warn that too much control could undermine the very flexibility that makes charter schools appealing. James Island Charter High’s principal, Tim Thorn, said charters already submit budgets and audits to local authorizers and that a board veto would tilt the balance toward traditional schools. A lobbyist for the South Carolina Public Charter School Alliance argued that increased authority could erode day‑to‑day independence. Charleston County’s share of charter funding is rising, with $77. 5 million allocated this year and a projected $6 million increase for 2027. Because the county has high property values, it raises more local revenue and receives less state aid per student. Local districts don’t get the extra state money that statewide charter authorizers receive, which adds to their financial pressure. The debate highlights a tension between ensuring fiscal responsibility and preserving the autonomy that defines charter schools. If the bill passes, it could set a new precedent for how local districts oversee the charters they authorize.