Ridgefield Schools Set New Course While Waiting on Finance Decision

The Ridgefield Board of Education met on March 24 to push forward several policy changes, talk about the upcoming school budget for fiscal year 2027, and look at new curriculum plans. The meeting ended with a mix of unanimous approvals, one split vote on a Title IX rule, and a talk about a fresh U. S. history textbook for high school students. Superintendent Susie Da Silva said the district is still waiting on the Board of Finance to approve the budget after a public hearing. She hopes the finance board will adopt it as is, but notes that more work remains before final approval. The finance vote is expected later this month, with a town and school budget referendum scheduled for May. During the public comment period, resident Dawn‑Marie Callahan urged the board to create a long‑term strategic plan. She believes having a clear roadmap would help both the board and the public understand how money is spent each year. Callahan said aligning yearly budgets with broader goals would make priorities clearer for everyone. Board Chair Tina Malhotra announced that a new outreach committee had its first meeting. The group identified four main priorities, including getting student input and working with community groups such as the PTA. Future meetings will be recorded, and more board members may join depending on the agenda.The board also heard a recommendation to adopt a new U. S. history textbook for Ridgefield High School, replacing the 2002 edition. The suggested McGraw Hill book would be available in print and digitally, with features to support inquiry‑based learning and differentiated instruction. The cost is about $52, 000 for books, a six‑year digital license, and teacher training. The board did not vote on this proposal yet; it will be revisited later. A Title IX policy update sparked a 6‑1 vote. Some members worried the new rule could expose the district to legal challenges or loss of federal funding, citing cases in other Connecticut schools. Chair Malhotra reminded the board that they must follow state law, while another member said the policy is legally required. District officials explained that Connecticut law hasn’t changed; the update simply clarifies procedures. Other policy changes received unanimous approval, such as updates to non‑discrimination rules for students and staff, a new dress code policy, a library collection development plan, and policies on parental access to instructional materials. The board also rescinded an outdated rule about married or pregnant students and updated enrollment and staffing guidelines. Enrollment rose slightly to 4, 408 students, mainly due to preschool growth.