Trump's Sentencing: A Judge's Decision Explained

A judge in New York has made a significant ruling in Donald Trump's hush money case. The judge, Juan Merchan, said that Trump's election win doesn't change the fact that he should be sentenced. In an 18-page decision, Merchan explained his reasons. One key point is that a president-elect isn't immune from prosecution. This means Trump can't use his new role to avoid punishment. The judge also noted that Trump had always expected to win the election and face sentencing afterward. The judge acknowledged that Trump might not go to jail. Instead, he might get an "unconditional discharge, " which means the conviction stays on his record, but he doesn't face any other punishment. Trump's team said they'll continue to fight the case, calling it a hoax. The judge's decision also addressed Trump's criticism of the legal system, noting his "unrelenting and unsubstantiated attacks. " The judge wanted to ensure the jury's verdict wasn't ignored. He said that dismissing the case would damage people's trust in the law. He also thought that sentencing Trump now wouldn't interfere with his presidential duties. The judge's inclination is to give Trump an unconditional discharge, allowing him to pursue appeals.